Manton v. Marini
This text of 280 A.2d 403 (Manton v. Marini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion
This case involves an appeal from the decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County quashing appellant’s appeal from an award of arbitrators.
It appears clear from the record that appellant did not pay all of the record costs within the time prescribed by law. Act of June 16, 1836, P. L. 715, §27, [299]*299as amended, 5 P.S. §71. Payment of these costs within the twenty day period is mandatory to perfect the appeal. Madrid Motor Corporation v. Cashan, 206 Pa. Superior Ct. 383, 213 A. 2d 284 (1965); Fleisher v. Kaufman, 206 Pa. Superior Ct. 378, 212 A. 2d 846 (1965); Budde v. Sandler, 204 Pa. Superior Ct. 36, 201 A. 2d 247 (1964). Por this reason, the decision of the lower court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 A.2d 403, 218 Pa. Super. 298, 1971 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manton-v-marini-pasuperct-1971.