Manning v. Alexander

553 N.E.2d 264, 50 Ohio St. 3d 127, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 154
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 11, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1774
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 553 N.E.2d 264 (Manning v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manning v. Alexander, 553 N.E.2d 264, 50 Ohio St. 3d 127, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 154 (Ohio 1990).

Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed based on our decision in In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 222, 551 N.E. 2d 954, in which we held that appeal to this court pursuant to Section 2(B)(2)(a)(iii) of Article IV of the Ohio Constitution is

an adequate remedy at law to pursue a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and that such actions may not be maintained in habeas corpus.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lopez v. Wilson
Sixth Circuit, 2005
Fernando Lopez v. Julius Wilson, Warden
355 F.3d 931 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)
Frederick White v. James Schotten, Warden
201 F.3d 743 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
White v. Schotten
Sixth Circuit, 2000
Haynes v. Humphreys
1992 Ohio 36 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Murnahan
584 N.E.2d 1204 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)
Paul R. Manning v. George Alexander
912 F.2d 878 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 N.E.2d 264, 50 Ohio St. 3d 127, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manning-v-alexander-ohio-1990.