Mann v. State

112 So. 3d 176, 2013 WL 1974943
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mann v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8896
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 2013·No. No. 1D11-3033·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his conviction as a principal to attempted armed robbery and second-degree felony murder. Appellant argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal, because the State failed to present sufficient evidence to establish that he was a principal to the crimes. We disagree and affirm. We agree with Appellant, however, that there was insufficient evidence upon which the jury could find that Appellant actually possessed a firearm at the [177]*177time of the attempted robbery. Consequently, the imposition of the mandatory ten-year -minimum sentence the trial court assessed pursuant to section 775.087(2)(a), Florida Statutes, was erroneous. We reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with this opinion. Appellant need not be present for the resentencing.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.

VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mann v. State, 112 So. 3d 176, 2013 WL 1974943 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

112 So. 3d 176 (Mann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.