Mann v. Moore Spinning Co.
94 N.E. 1101, 208 Mass. 341, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 826
Opinion
It is settled by previous decisions that there was no aspect of the evidence put in by the plaintiff which entitled him to go to the jury. Murphy v. American Rubber Co. 159 Mass. 266. Kleinest v. Kunhardt, 160 Mass. 230. Feely v. Pearson Cordage Co. 161 Mass. 426. Thompson v. Norman [343] Paper Co. 169 Mass. 416. Pene v. Arnold Print Works, 181 Mass. 560. McRea v. Rood Rubber Co. 187 Mass. 326. McTiernan v. American Woolen Co. 197 Mass. 238. Goudie v. Foster, 202 Mass. 226.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mann v. Moore Spinning Co., 94 N.E. 1101, 208 Mass. 341, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 826 (Mass. 1911).
94 N.E. 1101 (Mann v. Moore Spinning Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Edminston
143 N.E. 529 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1924)