Kleinest v. Kunhardt

35 N.E. 458, 160 Mass. 230, 1893 Mass. LEXIS 57
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 29, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 35 N.E. 458 (Kleinest v. Kunhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kleinest v. Kunhardt, 35 N.E. 458, 160 Mass. 230, 1893 Mass. LEXIS 57 (Mass. 1893).

Opinion

Knowlton, J.

The plaintiff fell, and in falling caught one of his hands in a pulley on a washing machine in the defendants’ mill, and was injured. The floor was wet and slippery with soap and water from the washing machines, and the defendants are alleged to have been negligent in allowing the floor to be in that condition, and the pulley to be exposed near a place where workmen were expected frequently to pass.

The plaintiff testified that the floor was always wet, and it appears that the condition of the floor and the pulley at the time when he entered the defendants’ service were the same as at the time of the accident. This condition was open and obvious, and it must be held that the plaintiff impliedly contracted, not only to work in this place, but also to assume the risk of accidents arising from the wet floor and the exposed pulley. O'Maley v. South Boston Gras Light Co. 158 Mass. 135. Fisk v. Fitchburg Railroad, 158 Mass. 238. The defendants were under no obligation to the plaintiff to change the condition of their works in these particulars.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Standard Knitting Mills v. Hickman
133 Tenn. 43 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1915)
Mann v. Moore Spinning Co.
94 N.E. 1101 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Saversnick v. Schwarzschild & Sulzberger Co.
125 S.W. 1192 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
120 N.W. 360 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1909)
McCafferty v. Lewando's French Dyeing & Cleansing Co.
80 N.E. 460 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
St. Louis Cordage Co. v. Miller
126 F. 495 (Eighth Circuit, 1903)
Garant v. Cashman
66 N.E. 599 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Marcan
106 F. 645 (Eighth Circuit, 1901)
Whalen v. Whitcomb
59 N.E. 666 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
Content v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
43 N.E. 94 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Cassady v. Boston & Albany Railroad
41 N.E. 129 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Goodes v. Boston & Albany Railroad
38 N.E. 500 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 N.E. 458, 160 Mass. 230, 1893 Mass. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleinest-v-kunhardt-mass-1893.