Mann v. Hyams

101 Ala. 431
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1893·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

HARALSON, J.

The statute (Code, 3612) authorizes an appeal to be taken from a decree sustaining or overruling a demurrer to a bill in equity. The appeal in this case purports to be taken from a decree of the city court sustaining a demurrer to the bill, and errors are assigned on such an alleged decree. But, on examination, we find no such decree in the record. In the transcript of the docket entries of the chancellor appears the following entry : ‘ ‘ April 18, 1893. Submitted for decree on demurrers to the bill, and demurrers sustained.” This is no decree, and, without one, an ap[432]*432peal does not lie to this court. The cause must be here dismissed. — Bell v. Otts, ante p 186, 13 So. Rep. 43; Wagnon v. Keenan, 77 Ala. 519; Joyner v. State, 78 Ala. 448; Ayers v. State, 71 Ala. 11.

Dismissed.

[433]*433CASES IN THE Supreme Court of Alabama. NOVEMBER TERM, 1893.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mann v. Hyams, 101 Ala. 431 (Ala. 1893).

101 Ala. 431 (Mann v. Hyams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dawson v. Campbell
120 So. 2d 727 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Cooper v. Mann
114 So. 2d 267 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
Mangham v. Mangham
83 So. 2d 721 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Creson v. Main
48 So. 2d 306 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1950)
Bertrand v. Taylor
32 So. 2d 885 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)