Bertrand v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Bertrand v. Taylor

32 So. 2d 885, 250 Ala. 15

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedDecember 18, 1947

Docket1 Div. 287.

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 32 So. 2d 885 (Bertrand v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bertrand v. Taylor, 32 So. 2d 885, 250 Ala. 15 (Ala. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

FOSTER, Justice.

The only feature of the record which is thought to be a judgment from which the appeal was taken is a memorandum which is presumably a docket entry as follows: “2/4/47. Demurrer overruled.”

Such an entry is not a decree in equity as it would not be a judgment at law, which will support an appeal. Mann v. Hyams, 101 Ala. 431, 13 So. 681. Many cases are cited in 2 Ala.Dig., Appeal and Error, 123: later cases are Wilbanks v. Mitchell, 239 Ala. 167, 194 So. 513; Watkins Co. v. Goggans, 242 Ala. 222, 5 So.2d 472.

If the entry was completed on the minutes of the court, or if the judge “formulated and formally rendered” a decree, it does not appear in this record. See Lanier v. Russell, 74 Ala. 364, 367.

It is necessary to dismiss the appeal because there is no decree to support it.

Appeal dismissed.

GARDNER, C. J., and LAWSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI