Mann v. Davide

Eleventh Circuit

Mann v. Davide

458 F. App'x 836

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 21, 2012·No. No. 11-12201·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John W. Mann appeals pro se the dismissal of his complaint of fraud, replevin, and conversion against Salvatore Davide, Jeffrey Feiler, William Troy, and Joan Schwartz. The district court dismissed Mann’s complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). The district court ruled that the complaint failed either to state a claim arising under federal law, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or to allege complete diversity of citizenship among the parties, id. § 1332(a), and Mann does not challenge that ruling. Mann complains that he was denied an opportunity to present his case, but he fails to explain how the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction over his case. As a result, we affirm the dismissal of Mann’s complaint.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John W. Mann appeals pro se the dismissal of his complaint of fraud, replevin, and conversion against Salvatore Davide, Jeffrey Feiler, William Troy, and Joan Schwartz. The district court dismissed Mann’s complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). The district court ruled that the complaint failed either to state a claim arising under federal law, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or to allege complete diversity of citizenship among the parties, id. § 1332(a), and Mann does not challenge that ruling. Mann complains that he was denied an opportunity to present his case, but he fails to explain how the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction over his case. As a result, we affirm the dismissal of Mann’s complaint.

AFFIRMED.

Mann v. Davide, 458 F. App'x 836 (11th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

458 F. App'x 836 (Mann v. Davide) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related