Mann v. Davide
This text of 458 F. App'x 836 (Mann v. Davide) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John W. Mann appeals pro se the dismissal of his complaint of fraud, replevin, and conversion against Salvatore Davide, Jeffrey Feiler, William Troy, and Joan Schwartz. The district court dismissed Mann’s complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). The district court ruled that the complaint failed either to state a claim arising under federal law, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or to allege complete diversity of citizenship among the parties, id. § 1332(a), and Mann does not challenge that ruling. Mann complains that he was denied an opportunity to present his case, but he fails to explain how the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction over his case. As a result, we affirm the dismissal of Mann’s complaint.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
458 F. App'x 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-v-davide-ca11-2012.