Mann v. Archer
69 Ga. 767
This text of 69 Ga. 767 (Mann v. Archer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mann v. Archer, 69 Ga. 767 (Ga. 1882).
Opinion
Where no motion for new trial is made, the evidence should be embodied in the bill of exceptions, or attached as an exhibit thereto, and properly identified. A rule to distribute money having been tried on an agreed statement of facts, and exceptions been taken to the ruling thereon, the embodiment in the record of what purports to be a copy of the agreement, signed by counsel, is not sufficient.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Secured Insurance v. Whitley Construction
142 S.E.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Lewis & Matthews v. Sams & Son
95 S.E. 764 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
McClarty v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance
63 S.E. 224 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Johnson v. Gleaton, Jones & Co.
61 S.E. 493 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Partridge v. Hollinshead
30 S.E. 787 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
69 Ga. 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-v-archer-ga-1882.