Johnson v. Gleaton, Jones & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Johnson v. Gleaton, Jones & Co.

61 S.E. 493, 4 Ga. App. 383, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 305

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 18, 1908

Docket1094

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 61 S.E. 493 (Johnson v. Gleaton, Jones & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Gleaton, Jones & Co., 61 S.E. 493, 4 Ga. App. 383, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 305 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

“Where no motion for new trial is made, tlie evidence should be embodied in the bill of exceptions, or attached as an exhibit thereto, and properly identified [or since the act of 1889 (Civil Code, §5529), contained in a brief approved by the trial judge and made a part of the record]. A rule to distribute money having been tried on an agreed statement of facts, and exceptions: been taken to the ruling thereon, the embodiment in the record of what purports to be a copy of the agreement, signed by counsel, is not sufficient.” Mann v. Archer, 69 Ga. 767. See also Partridge v. Hollingshead, 105 Ga. 282 (30 S. E. 787).

Writ of error dismissed.

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

Submitted May 6, Decided May 18, 1908. L. W. Nelson, for plaintiff in error. Woolen & Hofmayer, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

“Where no motion for new trial is made, tlie evidence should be embodied in the bill of exceptions, or attached as an exhibit thereto, and properly identified [or since the act of 1889 (Civil Code, §5529), contained in a brief approved by the trial judge and made a part of the record]. A rule to distribute money having been tried on an agreed statement of facts, and exceptions: been taken to the ruling thereon, the embodiment in the record of what purports to be a copy of the agreement, signed by counsel, is not sufficient.” Mann v. Archer, 69 Ga. 767. See also Partridge v. Hollingshead, 105 Ga. 282 (30 S. E. 787).

Writ of error dismissed.

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

Submitted May 6, Decided May 18, 1908. L. W. Nelson, for plaintiff in error. Woolen & Hofmayer, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 S.E. 493, 4 Ga. App. 383, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-gleaton-jones-co-gactapp-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack