Manley v. Marsico

Ohio Supreme Court

Manley v. Marsico

862 N.E.2d 121, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1496

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 1, 2007

Docket2006-1263

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 862 N.E.2d 121 (Manley v. Marsico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manley v. Marsico, 862 N.E.2d 121, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1496 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Clinton App. No. CA2006-04-013. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Clinton County. On February 20, 2007, Eye Specialists, Inc. filed a reply brief pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. VI(4)(A). Whereas Eye Specialists, Inc. did not perfect an appeal to this court pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. II(2)(A)(l)(a) and is therefore not considered an appellant,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the reply brief of Eye Specialists, Inc. is stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clinton App. No. CA2006-04-013. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Clinton County. On February 20, 2007, Eye Specialists, Inc. filed a reply brief pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. VI(4)(A). Whereas Eye Specialists, Inc. did not perfect an appeal to this court pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. II(2)(A)(l)(a) and is therefore not considered an appellant,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the reply brief of Eye Specialists, Inc. is stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

862 N.E.2d 121, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manley-v-marsico-ohio-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack