Manhattan Railway Company v. . O'Sullivan
44 N.E. 1125, 150 N.Y. 569, 1896 N.Y. LEXIS 1022
Opinion
Order affirmed, on opinion below, with costs.
All concur, except O’Bbien, J., taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manhattan Railway Company v. . O'Sullivan, 44 N.E. 1125, 150 N.Y. 569, 1896 N.Y. LEXIS 1022 (N.Y. 1896).
44 N.E. 1125 (Manhattan Railway Company v. . O'Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Great Neck Water Authority v. Citizens Water Supply Co.
187 N.E.2d 786 (New York Court of Appeals, 1962)
In re City of New York
234 A.D. 399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
In re Charges against Skinkle
221 A.D. 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
In re the City of New York
152 A.D. 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Claim of Johns v. Village of Salamanca
129 A.D. 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Manhattan Railway Co. v. Stuyvesant
126 A.D. 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Long Island Railroad v. Reilly
89 A.D. 166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
In re the Town of Guilford
85 A.D. 207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Guilford v. Bradbury
83 N.Y.S. 312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)