Mangione v. General Railway Signal Co.

248 A.D. 810
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mangione v. General Railway Signal Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 A.D. 847

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, as to the first six specifications and as to the first [811]*811ten words of the seventh specification named in plaintiff’s reply affidavit. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance on the ground that the information sought is not necessary. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288.) (The order denies examination of defendant before trial in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff contracting silicosis.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mangione v. General Railway Signal Co., 248 A.D. 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 810 (Mangione v. General Railway Signal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.