Mangione v. General Railway Signal Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mangione v. General Railway Signal Co.

248 A.D. 810

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 810 (Mangione v. General Railway Signal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mangione v. General Railway Signal Co., 248 A.D. 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, as to the first six specifications and as to the first [811]*811ten words of the seventh specification named in plaintiff’s reply affidavit. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance on the ground that the information sought is not necessary. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288.) (The order denies examination of defendant before trial in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff contracting silicosis.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, as to the first six specifications and as to the first [811]*811ten words of the seventh specification named in plaintiff’s reply affidavit. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance on the ground that the information sought is not necessary. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288.) (The order denies examination of defendant before trial in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff contracting silicosis.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mangione-v-general-railway-signal-co-nyappdiv-1936.