Mangione v. General Railway Signal Co.
248 A.D. 847, 290 N.Y.S. 226, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7598
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order modified by striking out the privilege given in the third ordering paragraph to photograph any machinery, upon the ground that it extends beyond the purview of section 324 of the Civil Practice Act, and as modified affirmed, without costs. All concur. (The order grants plaintiff discovery and inspection of defendant’s plant in an action for personal injuries sustained by contracting silicosis.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mangione v. General Railway Signal Co., 248 A.D. 847, 290 N.Y.S. 226, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 847 (Mangione v. General Railway Signal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chippona v. General Railway Signal Co.
249 A.D. 255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)