Manca, Inc. v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 340
United States Customs Court·Decided July 31, 1958·No. No. 62227; protests 308918-K and 322110-K (New York)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following John P. Herber & Co., Inc. v. United States (30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed as to the items marked “A,” and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)). The items marked “B,” stipulated to be similar to the merchandise the subject of Manca, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874), were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1551, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manca, Inc. v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 340 (cusc 1958).

41 Cust. Ct. 340 (Manca, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manca, Inc. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 418 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)