Manca, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Manca, Inc. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 253

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 7, 1959

DocketNo. 62653; protests 58/15109, 58/15110, and 58/15345 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 253 (Manca, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manca, Inc. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 253 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Manca, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1874), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 228, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for photographic lenses and the items marked “B” at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 as parts of photographic cameras, not specially provided for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Manca, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1874), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 228, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for photographic lenses and the items marked “B” at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 as parts of photographic cameras, not specially provided for.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Cust. Ct. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manca-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack