Manatee County v. Reardon

880 So. 2d 691, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5834, 2004 WL 893845
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 2004·No. No. 2D03-4032·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the face of the record and on the issues presented, we are compelled to conclude that the trial court was correct in determining that the parties were bound by the joint stipulation and order of court dated April 13, 1988. However, we are likewise compelled to conclude that the trial court erred in finding that the appellant, Manatee County, was in contempt because the trial court had not previously ordered Manatee County to specifically issue the permit in question. The finding that this was proper density regarding the subject property was not a directive to issue the permit. Thus, the County’s actions in failing to comply were not a wilful violation of a court order.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s ruling insofar as it determines that the density of the property shall be in accordance with the joint stipulation and order of court dated April 13, 1988. However, we reverse as to the finding of contempt.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WHATLEY, CASANUEVA, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manatee County v. Reardon, 880 So. 2d 691, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5834, 2004 WL 893845 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

880 So. 2d 691 (Manatee County v. Reardon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manatee County v. Reardon
884 So. 2d 205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)