Mamadou Cisse v. Michael Bernacke, et al.

Opinion

Mamadou Cisse, Case No. 2:26-cv-00387-JAD-BNW

Petitioner Order Appointing Counsel, Directing Service of 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition, and v. Setting a Briefing Schedule

Michael Bernacke, et al., [ECF Nos. 1, 1-1, 1-3]

Respondents

Petitioner Mamadou Cisse, an immigration detainee who is challenging the lawfulness of his federal detention at Nevada Southern Detention Center, has filed a pro se petition for federal habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), and moved for the appointment of counsel.1 I find that good cause exists to grant the petitioner’s IFP motion and that the appointment of counsel is in the interest of justice, given, among other things, the complexities of this case.2 And having conducted a preliminary review of the habeas petition, I direct that it be served on the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada. I also set a briefing schedule for an amended petition, response, and reply. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for leave to proceed IFP [ECF No. 1] is GRANTED. Petitioner is granted leave of court to proceed without paying the filing fee for this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel [ECF No. 1-3] is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada is appointed to 1 ECF Nos. 1, 1-1, 1-3. 2 Prisoners applying for habeas corpus relief are entitled to appointed counsel when the circumstances indicate that appointed counsel is necessary to prevent due process violations or when the interests of justice so require. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986). represent the petitioner and is directed to file a notice of appearance (or indicate its inability to represent the petitioner) within 7 days of the date of this order. If the FPD is unable to represent the petitioner because of a conflict of interest or for any other reason, alternate counsel will be appointed. Appointed counsel will represent the petitioner in all federal proceedings related to this matter, including any appeals or certiorari proceedings, unless allowed to withdraw.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the FPD files a notice of appearance in this matter, it will then have 14 days to file an amended petition (or to indicate that an amended petition is unnecessary). The FPD must effectuate service of the amended petition on the respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to: 1. FILE the petition (ECF No. 1-1). 2. SEND a copy of the petition (ECF No. 1-1) and this order to the FPD, the petitioner, and the CJA Coordinator for this division. 3. ADD the United States Attorneys’ Office for the District of Nevada to the docket as an Interested Party. Pursuant to District of Nevada’s General Order 2026-03

(Feb. 13, 2026), this constitutes service on all federal respondents under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and 28 U.S.C. § 2243. 4. MAIL a copy of the petition (ECF No. 1-1) and this order pursuant to Rule 4(i)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to John Mattos, Warden, Nevada Southern Center, 2190 E. Mesquite Ave. Pahrump, NV 89060. 5. SEND a courtesy copy of the petition (ECF No. 1-1) and this order to Ashley Hesman (Mattos’s attorney) at ahesman@strucklove.com. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada must file a notice of appearance within 7 days of the date of this order and file and serve 1} their answer to the amended petition within 7 days of service of the petitioner’s counseled amended petition. The respondents must file any documents referenced or relied upon in their responsive pleading with that pleading.’ Petitioner will then have 7 days to file a reply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must meet and confer regarding any 5 requests for an extension of deadlines and stipulate to the extension if possible. Any motion for extension must certify efforts taken to meet and confer and indicate the opposing party’s position 7\|regarding the extension. Any motion or stipulation must comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules IA 6-1, 6-2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondents must not transfer the petitioner out of this district, with the exception of effectuating the petitioner’s lawful deportation.* US. District Jug ge J emifer Dorsey February 1872026 See Harris v. Nelson, 394 U.S. 286, 290 (1969) (holding that “a district court, confronted by a petition for habeas corpus [that] establishes a prima facie case for relief, may use or authorize the use of suitable discovery procedures . . . reasonably fashioned to elicit facts necessary to help the court to ‘dispose of the matter as law and Justice require.’” (cleaned up) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2243)). 4 See F.T.C. y. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting the court may use its “express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction’’).