Malone v. District of Columbia Housing Authority

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedNovember 19, 2009
DocketCivil Action No. 2009-2185
StatusPublished

This text of Malone v. District of Columbia Housing Authority (Malone v. District of Columbia Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malone v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, (D.D.C. 2009).

Opinion

FILED NOV 19 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District and FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bankruptcy Courts

Joan Francis Mary Malone, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. O~ 2185 ) District of Columbia Housing Authority, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court on consideration of plaintiffs pro se complaint and

application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application, and dismiss the

complaint.

Unlike state courts of general jurisdiction, federal district courts have limited jurisdiction.

A federal district court has jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or

treaties of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Here, however, the complaint asserts claims

or facts supporting claims for common law torts including, among other things, harassment, libel,

slander, trespass, breach of contract, negligence, and destruction of property. Although the

opening paragraph of the complaint describes it as one for "discrimination," there are no facts

alleging or otherwise stating or implying that the plaintiff is a member of a protected group or

that any defendant has acted on the basis of discriminatory animus. Therefore, the Court is

unable to discern a basis for jurisdiction under § 1331.

A federal district court also has jurisdiction over civil actions in matters where the

controversy exceeds $75,000 and is between citizens of different states. See 28 C.F.R. § 1332(a). But here it appears that both plaintiff and defendants are citizens of the District of Columbia.

Therefore, there is also no federal court jurisdiction under § 1332(a).

Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

Date: 10 / l-1 I0' ~~ ~ United StatesDis

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal question
28 U.S.C. § 1331

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Malone v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malone-v-district-of-columbia-housing-authority-dcd-2009.