Mallison v. Scribner
This text of 715 N.W.2d 72 (Mallison v. Scribner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Julie A. MALLISON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Randy SCRIBNER and Dorothie Ruth Lack, a/k/a Dorothie Ruth Graves, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion to strike the application for leave to appeal is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the November 17, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Gogebic Circuit Court for further proceedings. The Court of Appeals and the Gogebic Circuit Court erred in finding, as a matter of law, that as a result of plaintiff's impaired ability to function due to the influence of intoxicating liquor, she was 50% or more the cause of the accident that resulted in her injuries and that she is barred from recovery under MCL 600.2955a(1).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
715 N.W.2d 72, 475 Mich. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mallison-v-scribner-mich-2006.