Mallers v. Commercial Loan & Trust Co.
This text of 216 U.S. 613 (Mallers v. Commercial Loan & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Commercial Loan & Trust Company, a banking corporation organized under the laws of Illinois, in 1895, brought suit against John B. Mailers upon a promissory note, and judgment was entered therein by-The appellate *614 'court for the first district in favor of the bank against Mailers, which judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court.
On the case being remanded to the appellate court an execution was issued by the clerk to enforce the collection of the judgment which Mailers moved to quash, and from the judgment of that court denying that motion á writ of error was prosecuted to the Supreme Court, which affirmed the judgment of the appellate court.
The case was then brought here on writ of error, which must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction: Hulbert v. Chicago, 202 U. S. 275; Burt v. Smith, 203 U. S. 129; Bonner v. Gorman, 213 U.S. 86.
.No Federal question was raised in the state courts, and the attempt to raise a Federal question in the assignment of errors in this court, not only came too late, but was palpably not maintainable. Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 U.S. 613, 30 S. Ct. 438, 54 L. Ed. 638, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mallers-v-commercial-loan-trust-co-scotus-1910.