Mallers v. Commercial Loan & Trust Co.

216 U.S. 613, 30 S. Ct. 438, 54 L. Ed. 638, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1934
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 14, 1910·No. 726·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Commercial Loan & Trust Company, a banking corporation organized under the laws of Illinois, in 1895, brought suit against John B. Mailers upon a promissory note, and judgment was entered therein by-The appellate *614 'court for the first district in favor of the bank against Mailers, which judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court.

On the case being remanded to the appellate court an execution was issued by the clerk to enforce the collection of the judgment which Mailers moved to quash, and from the judgment of that court denying that motion á writ of error was prosecuted to the Supreme Court, which affirmed the judgment of the appellate court.

The case was then brought here on writ of error, which must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction: Hulbert v. Chicago, 202 U. S. 275; Burt v. Smith, 203 U. S. 129; Bonner v. Gorman, 213 U.S. 86.

.No Federal question was raised in the state courts, and the attempt to raise a Federal question in the assignment of errors in this court, not only came too late, but was palpably not maintainable. Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mallers v. Commercial Loan & Trust Co., 216 U.S. 613, 30 S. Ct. 438, 54 L. Ed. 638, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1934 (1910).

216 U.S. 613 (Mallers v. Commercial Loan & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

West Virginia Motor Truck Ass'n v. Public Service Commission
123 F. Supp. 206 (S.D. West Virginia, 1954)
Diaz v. Porto Rico
243 U.S. 627 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Bowditch v. Jackson Co.
239 U.S. 627 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Welles v. Bryant
238 U.S. 612 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Commonwealth Trust Co. v. Trocon
235 U.S. 685 (Supreme Court, 1914)