Diaz v. Porto Rico
243 U.S. 627, 37 S. Ct. 402, 61 L. Ed. 936, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1582
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Montana ex rel. Haire v. Rice, 204 U. S. 291; Thomas v. Iowa, 209 U. S. 258; Mallers v. Commercial Loan & Trust Co., 216 U. S. 613; Appleby v. Buffalo, 221 U. S. 524, 529. (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diaz v. Porto Rico, 243 U.S. 627, 37 S. Ct. 402, 61 L. Ed. 936, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1582 (1917).
243 U.S. 627 (Diaz v. Porto Rico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Montant Ex Rel. Haire v. Rice
204 U.S. 291 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Thomas v. Iowa
209 U.S. 258 (Supreme Court, 1908)
Mallers v. Commercial Loan & Trust Co.
216 U.S. 613 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Appleby v. City of Buffalo
221 U.S. 524 (Supreme Court, 1911)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Overton v. Oklahoma
235 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Stewart v. City of Kansas
239 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1915)