Malish v. Nago

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided November 22, 2022·No. SCEC-22-0000682·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX 22-NOV-2022 08:01 AM Dkt. 14 ODMR

SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

JAMES RYAN MALISH and KARL O. DICKS, Plaintiffs,

vs.

SCOTT NAGO, acting in official capacity of Chief Election Officer, STATE OF HAWAIʻI OFFICE OF ELECTIONS, and ELECTIONS COMMISSION, Defendants.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of this court’s November 14, 2022 order dismissing complaint in part, and the record, this court has not overlooked or misapprehended points of law or fact. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b). Accordingly, it is ordered that the motion is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 22, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malish v. Nago, (haw 2022).

Malish v. Nago (Malish v. Nago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.