Malish v. Nago
This text of Malish v. Nago (Malish v. Nago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX 14-NOV-2022 08:44 AM Dkt. 8 ORD
SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
JAMES RYAN MALISH and KARL O. DICKS, Plaintiffs,
vs.
SCOTT NAGO, acting in official capacity of Chief Election Officer, STATE OF HAWAIʻI OFFICE OF ELECTIONS, and ELECTIONS COMMISSION, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT IN PART (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
On November 4, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an election
complaint that appears to seek relief under the primary election
contest statute, HRS § 11-173.5. It is beyond the allowable
time to seek relief under HRS § 11-173.5. See HRS § 11-173.5(a)
(“In a primary . . . election contest, . . . the complaint shall
be filed in the office of the clerk of the supreme court no
later than 4:30 p.m. on the thirteenth day after a primary . . .
election[.]”). To the extent Plaintiffs’ arguments seek relief
under HRS § 11-173.5, these claims are untimely. Accordingly, It is ordered that the complaint is dismissed in part,
or to the extent relief is sought under HRS § 11-173.5. The
court will instead construe the complaint as a general election
contest.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 14, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Malish v. Nago, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malish-v-nago-haw-2022.