Maline v. City of Utica

267 A.D.2d 1022, 701 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13776
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1999·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint against defendant Advanced Absorber Products, Inc. dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendant Advanced Absorber Products, Inc. (AAP) to dismiss the complaint against it. AAP established that in 1982 it merged with defendant Keene Corporation (Keene). As a result of the merger, Keene became the owner of all real and personal property (see, Business Corporation Law § 906 [b] [2]) and assumed all its “liabilities, obligations and penalties” (Business Corporation Law § 906 [b] [3]). Consequently, any cause of action that plaintiffs could assert against AAP must be asserted against Keene. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Parker, J. — Dismiss Pleading.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maline v. City of Utica, 267 A.D.2d 1022, 701 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 1022 (Maline v. City of Utica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related