Malerba v. Incorporated Village of Huntington Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Malerba v. Incorporated Village of Huntington Bay

78 A.D.2d 899, 433 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13649

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 1980·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 29, 1979, which denied the appellants’ motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Summary judgment in favor of the appellants should have been granted. Although a refusal by the police to render assistance to an individual can have serious effects, a municipality cannot be cast in damages for the police failure to perform unless the plaintiff can show that the police owed a “special duty” to him upon which he could rely (Gordon v Holt, 65 AD2d 344, 350-351; Dutton v City of Olean, 60 AD2d 335, affd 47 NY2d 756; Murrain v Wilson Line, 270 App Div 372, affd 296 NY 845; Evers v Westerberg, 38 AD2d 751). In this case, the plaintiffs were unable to make that showing. Damiani, J. P., Cohalan, Hargett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 29, 1979, which denied the appellants’ motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Summary judgment in favor of the appellants should have been granted. Although a refusal by the police to render assistance to an individual can have serious effects, a municipality cannot be cast in damages for the police failure to perform unless the plaintiff can show that the police owed a “special duty” to him upon which he could rely (Gordon v Holt, 65 AD2d 344, 350-351; Dutton v City of Olean, 60 AD2d 335, affd 47 NY2d 756; Murrain v Wilson Line, 270 App Div 372, affd 296 NY 845; Evers v Westerberg, 38 AD2d 751). In this case, the plaintiffs were unable to make that showing. Damiani, J. P., Cohalan, Hargett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Malerba v. Incorporated Village of Huntington Bay, 78 A.D.2d 899, 433 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

78 A.D.2d 899 (Malerba v. Incorporated Village of Huntington Bay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related