Maldonado v. Westchester County
This text of Maldonado v. Westchester County (Maldonado v. Westchester County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANTHONY MALDONADO, Plaintiff, -against- 18 CIVIL 11410 (PMH) JUDGMENT WESTCHESTER COUNTY, et al., Defendants.
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated February 2, 2021, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED. While "[dl]istrict courts should frequently provide leave to amend before dismissing a pro se complaint...leave to amend is not necessary when it would be futile.” Reed v. Friedman Met. Corp., 541 F.App'x 40, 41 (2d Cir. 2013) (citing Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000)). Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as any amendment would be futile; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 2, 2021
RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: K. mart go Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Maldonado v. Westchester County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maldonado-v-westchester-county-nysd-2021.