Makinson (Steven P.), Tipton (Daniel R.) v. City of Eugene, Oregon, City of Springfield, Oregon, Nauta (Gary), Siel (Rick B.), McCarthy (Timothy), Olson (Robert), Egeter (Steve), Antoine (Robert)
This text of 828 F.2d 23 (Makinson (Steven P.), Tipton (Daniel R.) v. City of Eugene, Oregon, City of Springfield, Oregon, Nauta (Gary), Siel (Rick B.), McCarthy (Timothy), Olson (Robert), Egeter (Steve), Antoine (Robert)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
828 F.2d 23
Makinson (Steven P.), Tipton (Daniel R.)
v.
City of Eugene, Oregon, City of Springfield, Oregon,
Nauta (Gary), Siel (Rick B.), McCarthy
(Timothy), Olson (Robert), Egeter
(Steve), Antoine (Robert)
NO. 86-3803
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
SEP 03, 1987
Appeal From: D.Or.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
828 F.2d 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/makinson-steven-p-tipton-daniel-r-v-city-of-eugene-oregon-city-of-ca9-1987.