Maitland v. Gibson
63 F. 840, 11 C.C.A. 446, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2444
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 22, 1894·No. No. 17·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
After a thorough examination of this record, we fail to discover any ground for disturbing the decree dismissing the bill of complaint. We all concur in the conclusions of the circuit court, and in the reasons therefor expressed in its opinion. That opinion is so full and satisfactory that any further discussion of the case is needless. We therefore adopt the opinion of the court below as our own, and upon it we affirm the decree. Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maitland v. Gibson, 63 F. 840, 11 C.C.A. 446, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2444 (3d Cir. 1894).
63 F. 840 (Maitland v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lowell v. Triplett
77 F.2d 556 (Fourth Circuit, 1935)
Pelzer v. Dale Co.
103 F. 494 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1900)
Maitland v. Graham
96 F. 247 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois, 1899)
Horn & Brannen Mfg. Co. v. Pelzer
91 F. 665 (Third Circuit, 1898)
Pelzer v. Geise
87 F. 869 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1898)
Paul Boynton Co. v. Morris Chute Co.
87 F. 225 (Third Circuit, 1898)
Maitland v. Archer & Pancoast Co.
72 F. 660 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1896)