Maisano v. Trans Car Inc.

416 F. App'x 605
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 2011
Docket07-56860
StatusUnpublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 416 F. App'x 605 (Maisano v. Trans Car Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maisano v. Trans Car Inc., 416 F. App'x 605 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Dale Frank Maisano, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, O’Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Maisano’s application because he failed to submit the required six-month prisoner trust fund account statement. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir.2000) (“[P]risoner-plaintiffs seeking to proceed in forma pauperis [must] submit a certified copy of their prisoner trust fund *606 account statement for the previous six months.”).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Langston v. Clemons-Abdullah
E.D. Missouri, 2025
Hudson v. Malone
E.D. Missouri, 2025
Peak v. Shoemaker
E.D. Missouri, 2025
Tipton v. Prather
E.D. Missouri, 2025
Counts v. State of Missouri
E.D. Missouri, 2024
Pollett v. Lee
E.D. Missouri, 2024
Mills v. Precythe
E.D. Missouri, 2024
Diamond v. Stange
E.D. Missouri, 2024
Beal v. Greenman
E.D. Missouri, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
416 F. App'x 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maisano-v-trans-car-inc-ca9-2011.