Counts v. State of Missouri
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER J. POTTER ) Petitioner, Vs. ) Case No. 4:24-cv-00245 SEP MICHELLE BUCKNER, et al., Respondents. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order. Doc. [13]. In his motion, Petitioner alleges mistreatment by a correctional officer at the facility where he is in custody. /d. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied without prejudice to his ability to bring such claims in a separate cause of action. In this case, Petitioner’s Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is pending before the Court. See Doc. [1]. In the instant motion, Petitioner appears to seek relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Both the federal habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and the civil rights statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, provide access to a federal forum for constitutional claims against state officials. But the statutes differ in both scope and operation. A state prisoner’s challenge to the validity of his confinement or to matters affecting its duration falls within the province of habeas corpus and, therefore, must be brought pursuant to § 2254. Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). Challenges to the conditions of confinement and other actions against state officials for civil wrongs may be presented in a § 1983 action. While Petitioner may simultaneously seek relief under § 1983 by filing a separate civil action, he may not seek relief under § 1983 in this habeas case. The Court will order the Clerk of Court to mail to Petitioner a copy of the Court’s form prisoner civil rights complaint so that he may file a separate action under § 1983 if he so chooses. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order, Doc. [13], is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to mail to Petitioner a copy of the Court’s form prisoner civil rights complaint. Dated this 28™ day of June, 2024. Zhe Liege SARAH E. PITLYK, U°S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Counts v. State of Missouri (Counts v. State of Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.