Mainor v. Hobbie

238 So. 2d 499, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6015
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mainor v. Hobbie. Read the opinion of the Court — 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6239
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 1970·No. No. M-371·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of a summary judgment rendered in favor of appellees.

The sole issue raised by the pleadings is whether the original owners and developers of a subdivision effectively dedicated to public use an irregular strip of land lying between a parcel of land owned by appellants and the waters of Black-water Bay in Santa Rosa County. A careful examination of the record on appeal conclusively establishes the absence of any genuine triable issue of a material fact and that appellees were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. Florida State Turnpike Authority v. Michael Baker, Jr., Inc., (Fla.App.1963) 156 So.2d 198; Pass v. Friedman, (Fla.App.1962) 140 So.2d 883; Osborne v. Shell Oil Company, (Fla.App.1958) 104 So.2d 670; Tooke v. Fosgate Citrus Concentrate Co-operative, (Fla.1956) 85 So.2d 828.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON, and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mainor v. Hobbie, 238 So. 2d 499, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6015 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

238 So. 2d 499 (Mainor v. Hobbie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pass v. Friedman
140 So. 2d 883 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Osborne v. Shell Oil Co.
104 So. 2d 670 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Florida State Turnpike Authority v. Michael Baker, Jr., Inc.
156 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Tooke v. Fosgate Citrus Concentrate Cooperative
85 So. 2d 828 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)