Maietta v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maietta v. Goord

289 A.D.2d 830, 734 N.Y.S.2d 505, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12309

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 289 A.D.2d 830 (Maietta v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maietta v. Goord, 289 A.D.2d 830, 734 N.Y.S.2d 505, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12309 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of controlled substances. The determination has since been annulled and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. As petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Witherspoon v Goord, 243 AD2d 931).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of controlled substances. The determination has since been annulled and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. As petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Witherspoon v Goord, 243 AD2d 931).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 830, 734 N.Y.S.2d 505, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maietta-v-goord-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack