Maidman v. Beverly Hotel, Inc.

279 A.D. 1050, 113 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5773
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 13, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 A.D. 1050 (Maidman v. Beverly Hotel, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maidman v. Beverly Hotel, Inc., 279 A.D. 1050, 113 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

For the purpose of this appeal it sufficiently appears that the minds of the parties met in writing on the basis that title was to close in ninety days or earlier, at seller’s option, for a purchase price of $2,150,000 to be paid all cash above the existing mortgages unless the parties, in the meantime, by a more definite contract agreed otherwise. In any event, there would be a triable issue concerning whether the use of the words “partial deposit” does not refer to payment on account of purchase price rather than an additional amount of deposit on the execution of the contract. Present — Callahan, J. P., Van Voorhis, Shientag, Heffernan and Bergan, JJ.; Callahan, J. P., concurs in result upon the ground last stated above.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maidman v. Beverly Hotel, Inc.
280 A.D. 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 1050, 113 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maidman-v-beverly-hotel-inc-nyappdiv-1952.