Maia v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.
This text of 141 Misc. 140 (Maia v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order unanimously reversed upon the law, with costs and taxable disbursements, and complaint dismissed with appropriate costs in the court below.
Plaintiff has recovered a judgment based upon a tort which occurred on a British vessel in the territorial waters of Brazil. The recovery was predicated upon the negligence of a fellow-servant of the plaintiff. The “ Jones Act ” (U. S. Code, tit. 46, § 688) is inapplicable. There was neither allegation nor proof, and it may not be presumed, that a similar statute existed either in Great Britain or Brazil. The burden of estabhshing such laws was upon the plaintiff. (Christie v. Cerro de Pasco Copper Corp., 214 App. Div. 820; affd., 243 N. Y. 557; Cuba R. R. Co. v. Crosby, 222 U. S. 473; Mexican Cent. R. Co. v. Chantry, 136 Fed. 316.)
All concur; present, Cropsey, MacCrate and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 Misc. 140, 252 N.Y.S. 201, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maia-v-lamport-holt-ltd-nyappterm-1931.