Christie v. Cerro De Pasco Copper Corp.
214 A.D. 820
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Plaintiff’s only cause of action is in tort, and is governed by the laws of Peru. There is no presumption that the law of Peru is the same as our common law. (Cuba R. R. Co. v. Crosby, 222 U. S. 473; Mexican Cent. R. Co. v. Chantry, 136 Fed. 316; Oehler v. Hamburg-American Line, 84 Misc. 272.) There was no evidence offered as to the law of Peru. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Kapper, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christie v. Cerro De Pasco Copper Corp., 214 A.D. 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
214 A.D. 820 (Christie v. Cerro De Pasco Copper Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Industrial Export & Import Corp. v. Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp.
98 N.E.2d 466 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)
Arams v. Arams
182 Misc. 328 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
Maia v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.
141 Misc. 140 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)