Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Mahr v. General Telephone Co.

Mahr v. General Telephone Co.

163 So. 2d 285, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2943
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 22, 1964
DocketNo. 32812
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 163 So. 2d 285 (Mahr v. General Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mahr v. General Telephone Co., 163 So. 2d 285, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2943 (Fla. 1964).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS and ERVIN, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tieder v. Little
502 So. 2d 923 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Stahl v. Metropolitan Dade County
438 So. 2d 14 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Lippincott
383 So. 2d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 So. 2d 285, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahr-v-general-telephone-co-fla-1964.