Mahony v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Mahony v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

980 F.2d 1379

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 23, 1992·No. No. 90-9052·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION OF SUGGESTION OF REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAYITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having sua sponte requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION OF SUGGESTION OF REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAYITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having sua sponte requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Mahony v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 980 F.2d 1379 (11th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

980 F.2d 1379 (Mahony v. CSX Transportation, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related