Mahoney v. McGuire
485 N.E.2d 236, 66 N.Y.2d 622, 495 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17151
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that the addition of the word "forthwith” to the statutory provisions in question does not alter the rule of Matter of Pierne v Valentine (291 NY 333, 342) but, rather, only precludes an unnecessary or unwarranted delay which is not presented in this case.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mahoney v. McGuire, 485 N.E.2d 236, 66 N.Y.2d 622, 495 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17151 (N.Y. 1985).
485 N.E.2d 236 (Mahoney v. McGuire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Braun v. City of N.Y.
284 F. Supp. 3d 572 (S.D. Illinois, 2018)
Benson v. City of New York
15 Misc. 3d 1022 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
Curiale v. Capolino
883 F. Supp. 941 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Degnan v. Constantine
189 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
McManus v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
190 A.D.2d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Ameruso v. City of New York
141 Misc. 2d 389 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)
Gillott v. City of New York
662 F. Supp. 171 (S.D. New York, 1987)