Mahoney v. McGuire
This text of 485 N.E.2d 236 (Mahoney v. McGuire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that the addition of the word "forthwith” to the statutory provisions in question does not alter the rule of Matter of Pierne v Valentine (291 NY 333, 342) but, rather, only precludes an unnecessary or unwarranted delay which is not presented in this case.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
485 N.E.2d 236, 66 N.Y.2d 622, 495 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoney-v-mcguire-ny-1985.