Mahlman v. Jackson
This text of 291 So. 2d 247 (Mahlman v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendants in the trial court appeal a final judgment for the plaintiff which was entered pursuant to a jury verdict. The single point presented for our review [248]*248urges that the trial court committed prejudicial error by a comment made in ruling upon plaintiff’s objection to an argument offered by defendants’ counsel during closing argument.
After reviewing the record, including the trial court’s remarks to the jury at the request of defendants’ counsel after the error occurred, and considering the circumstances of this case and the verdict rendered, we hold that no prejudicial error occurred. See Crews v. Warren, Fla. App.1963, 157 So.2d 553.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
291 So. 2d 247, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahlman-v-jackson-fladistctapp-1974.