Mahin v. Mahin

169 So. 665, 125 Fla. 223, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1259
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mahin v. Mahin. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Fla. 546
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 22, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of Braswell versus Downs, 11 Fla. 62; McCorry v. Payne, 94 Fla. 209, 113 Sou. Rep. 212.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahin v. Mahin, 169 So. 665, 125 Fla. 223, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1259 (Fla. 1936).

169 So. 665 (Mahin v. Mahin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCamy v. Payne
113 So. 712 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Frankel v. Smith
113 So. 212 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1927)
Braswell v. Downs
11 Fla. 62 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1865)