Mahin v. Mahin

169 So. 665, 125 Fla. 223, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1259
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 22, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 169 So. 665 (Mahin v. Mahin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mahin v. Mahin, 169 So. 665, 125 Fla. 223, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1259 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of Braswell versus Downs, 11 Fla. 62; McCorry v. Payne, 94 Fla. 209, 113 Sou. Rep. 212.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCamy v. Payne
113 So. 712 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Frankel v. Smith
113 So. 212 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1927)
Braswell v. Downs
11 Fla. 62 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 So. 665, 125 Fla. 223, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahin-v-mahin-fla-1936.