Mahendra Rudra Sharma v. Alexander Stevas, Clerk of the United States Supreme Court

Ninth Circuit

Mahendra Rudra Sharma v. Alexander Stevas, Clerk of the United States Supreme Court

790 F.2d 1486, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25918

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 9, 1986·No. 85-2296·Published·Cited by 28 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The judgment of the district court dismissing Sharma’s Federal Tort Claims Act action with prejudice is affirmed. The defendant Clerk of the United States Supreme Court has absolute quasi-judicial immunity because his challenged activities were an integral part of the judicial process. Morrison v. Jones, 607 F.2d 1269, 1273 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 962, 100 S.Ct. 1648, 64 L.Ed.2d 237 (1980).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The judgment of the district court dismissing Sharma’s Federal Tort Claims Act action with prejudice is affirmed. The defendant Clerk of the United States Supreme Court has absolute quasi-judicial immunity because his challenged activities were an integral part of the judicial process. Morrison v. Jones, 607 F.2d 1269, 1273 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 962, 100 S.Ct. 1648, 64 L.Ed.2d 237 (1980).

Mahendra Rudra Sharma v. Alexander Stevas, Clerk of the United States Supreme Court, 790 F.2d 1486, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25918 (9th Cir. 1986).

Pincite

790 F.2d 1486 (Mahendra Rudra Sharma v. Alexander Stevas, Clerk of the United States Supreme Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related