Mahala Ault v. Walt Disney World Co.
This text of 405 F. App'x 401 (Mahala Ault v. Walt Disney World Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude for the reasons fully discussed at oral argument that the district court erred in concluding that the named plaintiffs lacked prudential standing. The interests sought to be protected by the named plaintiffs are arguably within the zone of interest protected by 42 U.S.C. § 12182.
Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings, including inter alia a determination as to whether the claims of the named plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the class and whether they are adequate representatives of the class.
VACATED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
405 F. App'x 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahala-ault-v-walt-disney-world-co-ca11-2010.