Magner v. H. J. Trumbull & Co.
33 Ill. App. 646, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 478
Opinion
The brief for the appellants indicates that they are endeavoring to pay an honest debt to the appellees with a technical rule of law; but as no abstract of the evidence, only an index to the names of the witnesses has been filed, the court will not look to see whether the rule applies. C. & G. T. Ry. v. Crolie, 33 Ill. App. 17. The judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Magner v. H. J. Trumbull & Co., 33 Ill. App. 646, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 478 (Ill. Ct. App. 1889).
33 Ill. App. 646 (Magner v. H. J. Trumbull & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flaningham v. Hogue
59 Ill. App. 315 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1895)
Raymond v. Hodgson
55 Ill. App. 423 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)
Richey v. Dunham
50 Ill. App. 246 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)
Iron Clad Dryer Co. v. Chicago Trust & Savings Bank
50 Ill. App. 461 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)
Zielinski v. Remus
46 Ill. App. 596 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)