Magee v. The Walt Disney Company
This text of Magee v. The Walt Disney Company (Magee v. The Walt Disney Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK QUINCY MAGEE, Plaintiff, -against- 19-CV-6992 (CM) THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY; THE ORDER OF DISMISSAL AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANY, Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated October 15, 2019, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)ai). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate all other pending matters. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: January 9, 2020 , New York, New York hi Wyk Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Magee v. The Walt Disney Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magee-v-the-walt-disney-company-nysd-2020.