Magee v. American Express
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK QUINCY MAGEE, Plaintiff, -against- 19-CV-8476 (CM) AMERICAN EXPRESS; CHASE CARD SERVICES; ORDER OF DISMISSAL CREDIT KARMA; EXPERIAN; TRANS UNION; EQUIFAX; CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated November 12, 2019, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)ai). The Court declines, under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c), to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims that Plaintiff may be asserting. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2020 , New York, New York hie. Iu . Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Magee v. American Express (Magee v. American Express) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.