Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership

692 A.2d 813, 240 Conn. 915, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 96

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMarch 27, 1997

DocketSC 15577

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 692 A.2d 813 (Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership, 692 A.2d 813, 240 Conn. 915, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 96 (Colo. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 563 (AC 14586), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was sufficient evidence in the record to create a material issue of fact as to whether the defendants had actual or constructive notice of prior trespassers?

“2. Is the rule of § 335 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts regarding the duty of care owed a trespasser applicable to an electric utility whose operations are governed by § 16-11-102 (a) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies?

“3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was sufficient evidence on the record to create a material issue of fact as to whether or not Royal Park Limited Partnership created or maintained the switch gear that caused the injury to the plaintiff?”

Brian T. Henebry and Barbara J. Sheedy, in support of the petition. Joel M. Ellis, in opposition. Decided March 27, 1997

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI