Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership

686 A.2d 125, 239 Conn. 948, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 498
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership. Read the opinion of the Court — 243 Conn. 552
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 4, 1996·No. SC 15577·Published

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 563 (AC 14586), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[949]*949Decided December 4, 1996 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15577. Brian T. Henebry and Barbara J. Sheedy, in support of the petition. Joel M. Ellis, in opposition.

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was sufficient evidence in the record to create a material issue of fact as to whether the defendants had actual or constructive notice of prior trespassers?

“2. Is the rule of § 335 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts regarding the duty of care owed a trespasser applicable to an electric utility whose operations are governed by § 16-11-102 (a) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership, 686 A.2d 125, 239 Conn. 948, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 498 (Colo. 1996).

686 A.2d 125 (Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership
680 A.2d 333 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1996)