Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership
This text of 686 A.2d 125 (Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 563 (AC 14586), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was sufficient evidence in the record to create a material issue of fact as to whether the defendants had actual or constructive notice of prior trespassers?
“2. Is the rule of § 335 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts regarding the duty of care owed a trespasser applicable to an electric utility whose operations are governed by § 16-11-102 (a) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 A.2d 125, 239 Conn. 948, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maffucci-v-royal-park-ltd-partnership-conn-1996.