Madrid v. Gomez

Ninth Circuit

Madrid v. Gomez

179 F.3d 1252, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6895, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5420, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 36342

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 7, 1999

Docket97-16237

StatusPublished

This text of 179 F.3d 1252 (Madrid v. Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Madrid v. Gomez, 179 F.3d 1252, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6895, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5420, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 36342 (9th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

179 F.3d 1252

Alejandro MADRID, Corlos Lutz, Ronnie Dewberry, Steven
Villa, Bruce Vorse, and Moses Johnson,
Individually and on Behalf of all Others
Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
JAMES GOMEZ, Steven Cambra, Susan Steinberg, M.D., Robert
Ayers, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 96-17277, 97-16237.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 7, 1999.

Before: WOOD, Jr.,* HALL, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

The Opinion filed July 2, 1998 [150 F.3d 1030], is withdrawn.

*

The Honorable Harlington Wood, Jr., Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI